dfr1973: (Default)
 Last week, John Michael Greer wrote a lovely little introductory post on affirmations, where he lays out seven basic rules for constructing affirmations.  I already picked up a few here and there - usually in the answers of Magic Mondays - enough to realize William Walker Atkinson was not a good source for affirmations.  There is a particularly bad example in The Master Mind, but I can't put my finger on at present.  I do recall the first two sentences (and right there is a problem in that it is too long for easy memorization): "Don't be such a weakling!  You are stronger than that."

Ouch.  That is the one that stuck out like a broken thumb on the first read-through, and as far as bad examples go, that's a real winner of a loser.  It starts out in the negative, which the subconscious does not process, then go into the swamp of relatives.  Stronger than what, exactly?  You should be trying to pip the bulls-eye with a sniper rifle, not a sawed-off shotgun.

So with just the first part of one affirmation, we illustrate two major blunders.

Typing up the two authors' names, makes me wonder if I should adopt a third name myself.  You know, sort of as a pseudonym to tag onto my given and family names.  This also brings up the question: three names, or three parts of a name?
dfr1973: (Default)
 I just finished up the last chapter of The Master Mind, and emailed it off to Temporary Reality.  If anyone else would like the files, drop me a line here or at my email (this username at g-male).

I may need a new printer cartridge, but most of it is printed out (What?  I can't even get a full book out of a printer cartridge these days?!?)  I have a red pen for the first pass-through, because Atkinson - whether writing under his own name or a pseudonym - definitely needed someone to edit his manuscripts for typos, misspellings, and grammar.  Then the real work begins: figuring out what needed to be cut out, where things need to be filled in, and what should stay.
dfr1973: (Default)
 Checking in for this week: I've started formatting The Master Mind and have gotten up to chapter 4 now.  This book lacks an introduction, and also seems to have been written as a book from the get-go, as opposed to The Power of Concentration, which started as a correspondence course.

One thing I noted last year in Memory was his extensive use of quotation, and in this book he doesn't even list a last name as attribution, preferring to say, "a well-known psychologist," or "an authority on the subject."  Some of these Google can find ... but there are some it can't, except for in Atkinson's books.  I am tempted to go on the supposition that Atkinson - writing as Dumont - quoted his earlier books that were written under his own name.  It's certainly possible, and I'm sure quite a few of us have seen people do the same online.  This does not invalidate the quotes - those stand or fall on their merit for how well they've held up over the past century.  Atkinson may or may not have been a con man, but I think he was no charlatan.  He had some real knowledge of magic.

What makes the previous assertion so humorous is the first paragraph of The Master Mind:

"In this book there will be nothing said concerning metaphysical theories or philosophical hypotheses; instead, there will be a very strict adherence to the principles of psychology. There will be nothing said of "spirit" or "soul"; but very much said of "mind." There will be no speculation concerning the question of "what is the soul," or concerning "what becomes of the soul after the death of the body." These subjects, while highly important and interesting, belong to a different class of investigation, and are outside of the limits of the present inquiry. We shall not even enter into a discussion of the subject of "what is the mind"; instead, we shall confine our thought to the subject of "how does the mind work."
 
Hey, Billy boy, pull the other leg while you're at it ... I think this is the proverbial wink-and-nod to those paying attention.  Then again, I've only read up to chapter four so far.  Chapters 3 and 4 slowed me down quite a bit, mostly because they left me with the feeling that there is more below the surface of what is written.

Oh, related to the topic of large quotations is a name Google and Wikipedia are giving up next to nothing when searched: Reuben Post Halleck.  In particular is a book he wrote called Psychology and Psychic Culture, which Atkinson loves to quote.  I've found a birth year and a death year for him, and a list of other titles he wrote, and the abstract of one academic paper on him and one of his contemporaries who published a book on neurology within a year of his book on the subject ... but as far as any kind of biography goes ... nada.  Anyone know anything about him?
dfr1973: (Default)
 I called it a minor irritation, but it's turned out to be not so minor after all.  In fact, it's bugging the **** out of me now.  Atkinson really should have put a note in the introduction that it would be beneficial to go through his book The Master Mind prior to starting The Power of Concentration.  It really does break the concentration knowing (but not until the second lesson!) that the book has a prereq.

So, I am detouring already, and have started formatting The Master Mind.  Anyone who wants a copy of the Wordpad *.rtf files, just drop me an email: this username at ye olde gmaile.  I've done the first two chapters today.

Profile

dfr1973: (Default)
dfr1973

September 2019

S M T W T F S
123 4 567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 14th, 2025 12:20 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios